is there any point at all in referencing using Mp3s since we all know the high end is very compromised? would it still be beneficial to study the lows/mids and mid side stuff of pro mixes even if its an mp3?
so essentially am I looking at going and buying reference tracks? are these going to be wavs? where is the best place to buy stuff?
there is always that âwhat ifâ factor where my ear isnt hearing a âproâ reference. Plus iâll always be questioning my matches using equivocate because it is going to sense the top end missing from the mp3
It depends on the bitrate of your mp3s. If they are 320 kbps, you will be fine.
I am actually preparing a thread on high-res music sources, which are noticeably superior in sound quality, so stay tuned for that (ha! tuned!) But for referencing, 320 mp3 works great.
For the same bit depth, your ear will not hear the difference between a 320 kbps mp3 and a 1000+ kbps wav file, unless you are super super sensitive at the high end. The vast majority of people are not. Bit depth is very different from bit rate. Check out this site to try it for yourself:
I took the quiz, listening on my monitors at about the same level I usually mix. I only got 2 right. For the first 4, I picked the 320b MP3. For the last 2 I picked the .WAV. (I think the MP3s were louder on those first ones!) Then towards the end, I was thinking those 2 sounder clearer. Iâm sure if I were to take it again, Iâd get a different result. When doing these things, at some point I find I tell myself to stop trying to âlistenâ and just âfeelâ⌠Oh well, time for more practice.
so essentially am I looking at going and buying reference tracks? are these going to be wavs? where is the best place to buy stuff?
Okay, to start out, Iâm mostly joking. But isnât this kind of the mindset of most people right now, home recordist or not? What Iâm talking about is the question of whether you need to buy music or not. Believe it or not that is a relatively new phenomenon.
If what you use for reference is relatively mainstream, have fun one day and go to a used CD shop. They are everywhere. I think everyone downloaded their CDs and sold them to buy BItcoins.
not sure im following but I assume you mean its dumb to buy when u can just dl stuff.
yeah, i have hundreds of mp3 dlâed off of youtube. Most of them being older stuff that I dig like Vh, ZepâŚsort of up thru grunge stuff like STP
The only semi modern stuff I have is some Chevelle, Audio Adrenaline, Shinedown, Alterbridge. Some of that was full albums dlâed on Mp4. So IMO a lot of it is of shady or questionable audio quality
I just want a few pristine quality songs i can dig into an analyze and reference with the confidence that im at least listening to something top notch
also, the youtube to mp3 converter I was using stopped working, im assuming its having to do with new net neutrality rules etc. It just says that youtube doesnt allow it blah blah
right now Chevelleâs âthe North Corridorâ is sounding pretty strong. I see it is produced by Joe Barresi who also did the Black Stone Cherry album with 'me and mary jane" which is another song I did with nice production
If thereâs a record where I want to study the production of it in depth or dump it into PT for a reference track, I need it in hi-def. Iâve used iTunes shit plenty of times for reference and it worksâŚbut if its a track you use regularly its worth it to me to buy a used copy of it and import the wav directly to the DAW. Again, you donât have to, because what youâre after in reference tracks is really overall EQ curve and the overall color/texture of stuff like kicks and snares and guitars. Its almost more of a like âhow loud in X in the mixâ? and âhow bright is X in the mixâ? which in my opinion, you can get a good frame of reference from a decently ripped Mp3.
Really, what I was referring to is that it wasnât that long ago that you had to buy the music, or at least make a bad copy of the stuff your friend bought. Lots of people today think music is a free commodity, which has thrown the whole industry out of whack, some of which was needed, some of which wasnât. Just showing what an old fart I am again, I guess. @Jonathan: I agree that a good Mp3 will probably work for referencing, but I donât mind spending $5 now and then on a used CD if Iâm actually impressed with the recording. Iâm mostly just saying that the normal frame of reference for the typical listener is why buy it when I can get it (or at least an inferior version of the original) for free?
I know in a home studio referencing is kind of like using a schematic, but Iâm just trying to rally the troops to always have the real thing instead of the schematic.