Time stretching at mastering stage: common practice or nonsense?

Totally, but it’s their choice and their artist career at the end.
Top artists also choose that way… for good reasons (I suppose, dunno which one…)

If you propose a hotter master, I bet the client would choose it, whatever explanations you’d give…

I think you may try to do something between what you expect and client’s expectations… (at least :blush:)

Edit: by the way, it’d be time to close that project and move on to the next one :slight_smile:

1 Like

I find Reaper does an excellent job whether speeding up, or slowing the tempo while still keeping the same pitch. I used to try this on the standalone machines I own/ owned, and I tended to get a lot of audio artifacts. I’m really impressed with Reaper.

Ah! Gotchya. So u didn’t have any control over the mix. I’m pretty ignorant of most mastering related topics so I don’t think I could comment on anything meaningful in that regard. Interesting discussion though :slight_smile: