holster
October 17, 2017, 5:56pm
#1
The Recording Academy (Grammy Awards) has released an update on the recommendations for high resolution music production. A worthwhile read.
2 Likes
Appears to be pretty straightforward, which is encouraging. I wonder how big of a market they can promote through high resolution recordings, but in any event anything that increases the income stream should be good for everybody.
One of the things that stuck out to me was the suggestion that it was not a good idea to master in MP3. Who the hell would send an MP3 master to a record company for promotion?
1 Like
CPF
October 17, 2017, 8:59pm
#3
Dummies, youâd be surprised actually. Iâm sure someone has sent an .amr file. Iâll have to read that, when I do Iâll get back to you all.
It looks like Warren Huart predicted it (96/24) after all, per my thread from a few weeks ago.
Interesting video from Warren Huart, I have been watching his stuff lately. Something he mentions in this Q&A video several times is the inevitability of 96k (96k/48k) as the new standard, whenever the industry comes around on it.
At 36:00 (which should be queued up) and at 50:00, Warren talks about 48k being the current standard, but that weâre moving toward âa 96k worldâ for broadcasting standards, label deliverables, mastering engineers, and iTunes. Obviously he suggests âmake sure your hardware can handle thatâ.
Is that a pursuit for âhigher qualityâ, or is it simply that people think âŚ
Then again, the doc has a â5-10-17 Finalâ date stamp on it, so maybe he saw it before we did? When was this released to the âpublicâ?
holster
October 17, 2017, 11:22pm
#5
Stan_Halen:
It looks like Warren Huart predicted it (96/24) after all, per my thread from a few weeks ago.
Will 96k be the new standard?
Then again, the doc has a â5-10-17 Finalâ date stamp on it, so maybe he saw it before we did? When was this released to the âpublicâ?
Heck, he may have even been involved in that document for that matter!
1 Like