As I was re-installing the computer, I pulled up an Andrew Scheps lecture at Oxford University on mixing and played it in the background while I was crawling around on the floor patching wires for almost 2 hours. At the end, someone asked him about rear-bus processing. He said to the room “I’m quite well known for my use of the rear bus, but who here doesn’t even know what that is?”
I have so many bad innuendos in my head, but I’m going to bite my tongue. Instead…
What the hell is rear bus processing? Is it a surround sound thing for the rear channels?
What a stupid thing to say. Hey, I’m famous for doing this thing. Oh, but no one knows what the fuck it is. Ha! I’m famous, but I know something you don’t know even though it’s the source of my fame, fortune, power, and men on “the inside”, so fuck you. That’s an oxymoron. I assume he means that people have heard of it, but don’t know what it does. He could have definitely put that better.
The term "Rear Buss"comes from the fact that the technique originated when he was using an old Neve Console originally designed for quadraphonic sound, so it had 2 stereo busses - a “front” and a “rear” buss…
It’s basically parallel mix compression. He used the rear buss as a parallel compression buss for the music…
It depends what else is happening on the RB track. I place transient designers and saturation units behind my parallel compressors, thought I don’t know if I’d do any of that on a rear bus.
So yes, theoretically…if you only used the Manic on the 2 bus, and blended wet/dry I don’t see why it wouldn’t be the same.