It really wouldn’t be that simple, for starters songs that are mixed usually leave headroom for mastering.
LOL. Joe Sturgis, huh? He’s a producer / educator. Who cares what he wants? You attract a producer that fits you. You don’t fit a producer.
Setting that aside, anyone who allows a Major Label to dictate what they do on their record is screwed. You never want to do that.
Do you realize how few acts are in a position to even be considered for a Major Label deal? This is especially so for bands right now. It’s always been a long shot. It’s an insane long shot now. These things go in waves, and bands had a great run for a while, now. It’s all about Max Martin and his team of pop writers. Anyway, good luck even getting anyone to hear your “demo” without people in the industry helping you. It’s not like it was 20 yeas ago when you could get a label deal without producers and managers. If you’re being groomed for that, you need a team of people, and that includes mixers and MEs, and they are going to help you get your product fully in order. But at the end of the day, you got nothing if you don’t got songs.
Think back to your first year or two recording. Those are the musicians what would be fine using automated mastering services.
Enjoy, Mixerman
1 Like
You don’t have to master anything no. But you do want to get a track up to a certain level because otherwise people won’t be able to hear it well under certain circumstances. This is why I recommend the automated mastering for people who just want to put their records online and who aren’t putting together a proper professional product. If you put up a song and it gets a reaction, you can always make a decision to do something with it at that point.
Enjoy, Mixerman
I’ve seen a lot of this first hand over the last year. This comment is 100% on the money. This may happen, but in my entire life, I’ve never AND I MEAN NEVER seen a label invest in an artist because they were so in love with the mix quality of the record they just HAD to have in on the licensing for it!
What’s funny to me is sometimes they also hire people to fix things that are just fine. I got a good laugh at a very very big label that begins with the letter S continuously ordering a stupid amount of remixes of the same song two years ago. It was one that I worked on that had been passed around from studio to studio and the big boys couldn’t decide on when it sounded good enough. Sometimes these guys are brilliant, sometimes they’re a bunch of directionless morons.
@Descent, I really do applaud the effort, but I have to ask what the goal is? If I remember correctly, you shared the album here, and the feedback was largely positive. Why are you planning on presenting these to ‘record companies’? What do you want from them? You mention distribution… How is that going to help?
Look, if everything you say is true, you managed to put a great product on the shelves by yourselves. If its selling at all, you must have done a number of things right! What do you feel you need a manager for? Are you at a point in your career where you can’t manage yourselves? What is going on in your band that is so difficult to manage that you guys can’t handle it on your own? Talk to me here.
I totally want you guys to be successful, and everyone on this website is rooting for you. The same way we were all behind Boz when he quit his job and started the plugin company. Perhaps I’m reading your stuff wrong, but if pursuing a record deal/management contract/whatever isn’t part of a clearly articulated bigger picture career strategy, there’s a point at which talking about it literally becomes moot.
@Descent, no one is picking on you, discouraging you, or downplaying that last recording you put out. But what Eric just said is again, dead on the money, and the same logic applies to the executive team in any company. If you own a restaurant, you hire a manager that fits the needs and the skill set of the establishment. You don’t re-vamp the establishment to attract a manager you want to hire. Same goes for a band hiring a manager.
1 Like
@Jonathan - two things really why we’re doing this, we are seeing ourselves as European band that unfortunately is stuck in Pantera-obsessed musically dead Houston. We have to make a move to Europe and a European label/distro deal/agent will be a dream come true, so we can play gigs in Europe. We’ve basically reached all we can do in Houston at this point and I can’t seem to be able to book us for Wacken, or anything else 
About Sturgis - I don’t particularly care, but there are a lot of bands that listen to his advice and start the typewriter drums and perfectly in pitch and sterile, right on the mark arrangements.
I am actually more in the school of Fenriz - I don’t know how much you are into this style of music (all genres metal) but this guy has a radio show and he picks the most organic and human sounding records available on the world market. I am absolutely impressed by most of his picks… and yeah, the mixes are definitely not perfect, but the tunes work with a production that probably the cheapest budget studio in here can pull off without a problem.
It might be cool to test the auto mastering thing with a blind test, similar to this one that I did a while ago with an actual mastering engineer:
1 Like
So the whole band is relocating from Houston to Europe?? Like… for day job related reasons? Do you guys all work of the same company and the company is relocating all of you guys together?
No, not really, but some of us have EU properties so we can use it as starting base for festivals, etc.
As long as there’s interest and we can land some proper gigs for summer fests.
2-3 months in EU is doable.
This is amusing to me (and probably many Europeans): the holy grail of ‘making it’ in rock music (or variations thereof) for us was and still is to have a hit and a tour in the US. The number of Dutch bands that have actually reached that holy status in the past 50 years are probably no more than about 10 (EDM excluded). One of the oldest Dutch bands is the Golden Earring (started in 1963). They had a big hit in the States with ‘Radar Love’ in the early seventies. I’m sure most of you know it. But did you know that was not an American band? Another example is this guitarist called Edward van Halen, better known as Eddy van Halen.
Am I to understand in metal music Europe is the place to be? I didn’t realise that.
Good luck with those gigs!
2 Likes
You know that you will all either need EU passports or a WORK PERMIT, dont you? Im not even sure if my British passport will allow me to work in Europe anymore (post Brexit). They will check your Facebook etc. and deport you, if they suspect the 5 Hairy Metal guys with guitars are not real tourists
Yes, “Radar Love” was a huge hit, and awesome song. I don’t remember at what point I found out it was a Dutch band but it was pretty quickly IIRC. It seemed to be well known in the States.
I was also aware that Edward Lodewijk Van Halen (and brother Alexander) was born in The Netherlands (as we call it), but didn’t hear the full story until I recently watch the Smithsonian YouTube video interview where he talks about all that. Funny story to hear that Eddie started on drums, Alex on guitar, then they switched when their natural talents became evident (after Alex commandeered the drum set, that is). Their father was a musician, even supported them with that after immigrating to the US. They were quite poor as he tells it. However, both Eddie and Alex had piano lessons and much exposure to music in the home.
It depends as markets shift, Europe ahs stayed much more loyal to its music, here anything with guitar is considered pretty much passe unless it is a hipster bemoaning his 20 year experience in life, with no backing band of course. Everybody books those “acts” nowadays.
We just got a licensing deal with German indie label, so at least we’re looking to shift a few unit in Germoney.
Van Halen IMO is one of the worst examples of schlock, talented guitarist, pretty much awful clown music, it was perfect for 80s hair era excess.
I’m wondering of how aware you are of how innovative eddie was for guitar playing and building. I van understanding of you don’t like thee music, but comparing them to clowns seems disrespectfull to me. Eddie’s ‘‘tricks’’ might be laughed at by so called ‘‘serious’’ musicians, but his skills are pretty serious. I realised it when i listend the stuff he plays AFTER the eruption solo on this video.
1 Like
Here’s the gyst of Van Halen
Descent, my old fruit…
Dissing EVH’s (or even Pantera’s) musical style is not really helping YOU get where you want to be on the big (world) stage. If you want, we could discuss the ins and outs of how your music makes us feel, or whether we would want to buy it, and why/ why not… is that what you are asking?
Maybe there should be a separate forum section for this… called, ‘Does my shit actually STINK, or what?/not?’
Talent does not equate to musical direction, or indeed mass popularity… but there ARE reasons people buy into it, or not.
Just doing something DIFFERENT may be the reason somebody is successful…
LoL 
Yeah well, it’s a Glam band, so it’s not that wierd. Every one plays an angle thoug, which every one is free to dislike. but doesn’t mean there can’t be more to it. In some cases the legacy is even undeniable 
. Many people dislike vai, but you can’t deny his legacy.
1 Like
Haha Wasn’t on purpose thoug.
Have you played one, I’ve always wanted to try them.
So, as far as the original question about automated mastering services…
Graham (recording revolution) makes the point that in mixing the goal is to get the song sounding it’s absolute best before sending it to mastering. Do whatever you can do to make it sound as good, or better, than professionally done reference mixes.
In this article from several years ago (Mix It To Sound Mastered), he cautions against looking at mastering as having to do with just “making a song sound better.” That is, first priority is getting a great recording – great raw materials to build with; next priority is balancing the raw materials to get the best mix possible.
He makes a great point here:
" One of the dumbest things you can do in audio is to defer responsibility to a later stage, or to someone else entirely. What I mean is this: many people setup to record a band and it sounds OK, but they assume it will sound better once it’s mixed, so they settle for mediocre sounds. Or they have great sounds, but too many to choose from. They defer the responsibility of committing to a tone or performance.
The same is happening for many of you when mixing. You near the end of a mix, but it doesn’t quite sound like the pro tracks that you’re referencing, so you assume it’s because it’s not mastered. You “give up” on your mix and defer the responsibility of making your mix awesome to the mastering engineer. Big mistake."
He goes on to say that one needs to understand that the goals of mixing and mastering are different: mixing is about “balancing the tracks,” whereas mastering is about “balancing the mixes.” That is, as he describes it, the role of mastering is to take (hopefully!) a compilation of great mixes and balance them against each other to sound good as a collection of songs. (That was Cristina’s point above)
His other point is that, as contrasted with mastering, the mix should not be concerned about output volume at all, apart from proper gain-staging. Stay way clear of clipping, concentrate on the mix, and leave output volume to the mastering phase.
So mastering should not be about just making your song sound better: it should be about balancing a compilation of songs against each other, finalizing the output volume, and a bit of polishing of the sound (perhaps mainly – or exclusively? – with EQ, compression, limiting, etc. But very subtle).
So, if that’s accurate, my take is that that’s where a lot of the automated mastering services fall short. Seems to me that people tend to look at them as serving the purpose of just tweaking the mix of a song. I mix a song and load it up to Landr and hope it makes it sound better, which is missing the purpose of mastering.
That said, as far as how well the online services do at making a song sound better (
), this video by White Sea Studio (the “snake oil” guy) does a pretty interesting comparison of the mastering of a song by Landr and some of the other online services, vs. by Ozone vs. also a professional mastering engineer. Good discussion plus you can hear the differences.
Good JCM800 clone, I played v.1, later on I think they added more gain.
@vtr I am not asking for your critique at this stage, nor would I care to receive it TBH.
To me EVH will always be tied in to his schlock Roxxo teh clown band no matter how talented. Had he broke out of that as it appeared to look with him joining MJ, we never know what would’ve happened, maybe a gig with Ozzy? I surely jest. He’s made his money and his chops are undeniable, it’s just all schlock to me. Just as is anything, for example, by Michael Angelo Batio. Now, I do love “Hot for Teacher” as that song/video puts me right into 4th grade every time I hear the song.