yep.
Im going to post some tracks in Bash in a few minutes, come check them out. Im trying to sound like AIC or vanHalen and I got a ways to go lol.
yep.
Im going to post some tracks in Bash in a few minutes, come check them out. Im trying to sound like AIC or vanHalen and I got a ways to go lol.
I was inspired by the 80s rap in general but i think it sounds similar to this with less reverb:
https://soundcloud.com/7-trumpeta/stash-shqiptar2-rap-hip-hop
I donât use just one reference song pr one track. Nor do I necessarily maintain a correlation between styles of music. What I was trying to point out was that I observe very specific qualities of certain mixes. For instance, if I want to check the width of the vocal, or the verb on a snare, or the balance of the sub bass on an 808âŚI have many different tracks that relate to the QUALITIES. Not the style.
If your logic is along the lines of: I want to see the correlation between someones reference tracks and their finished material, then I think youâre going about this the wrong way. It just doesnât work like that.
But its a good thing youâre bringing this up. I think reference tracks are an very important part of the process. Hereâs another tid-bit that gave me some good ideas. Ideas I still use today.
I have utterly screwed myself with reference tracks in the past - itâs bad enough chasing your own tail, try chasing someone elseâs! (HeheâŚ)
They are great for keeping your feet on the ground and giving yourself some common frames of reference. It took me quite a while to learn what theyâre not good for; telling you how to EQ or otherwise process the individual parts of your mix. Thatâs a recipe for a hiding, and I had to learn the hard way that just because something worked for someone elseâs mix, doesnât mean I can mangle my own tracks to sound the same.
Iâve got a playlist of about 30 tracks I know quite well which I pull up every now and then to make sure Iâm at least working within the ballpark of what might be socially acceptable from sound. Each song serves a specific purpose, things like
etc etcâŚ
So itâs more about building a sonic map of norms in my head and as long as my mix sounds good in itself and falls somewhere in the really wide realm of actual commercial releases Iâm referencing, Iâm happy!
yeah, this could be a cool ref track to sort of show how to combine the old (blues/rock gtr) with the new (more modern percussion style)
I use reference tracks tracks a couple of ways.
I have a few songs that I listen to over and over to remember my system and how it sounds, I might reference these tracks during tracking just to make sure Iâm not getting too far away from what I want. Iâm generally listening to frequency response in individual elements and an overall frequency response. I have about 3-4 songs I use regularly. I use these songs when I setup doing live events too.
Once I have a mix started or even during the tracking phase I start to get an idea of how I want this mix to sound. there is usually key elements that Iâm hearing that point me to a song or band. (you know when you say this song reminds me of X). Iâm never expecting it to be identical but it puts tones in perspective. I generally use a few songs to references based on tone choices with the mix Iâm working on. Iâm not trying to copy those tones but use how it works with the other instruments.
Once I have what I believe close to a finished mix I will either use one of my references or maybe even another reference and make sure my instruments are balanced to one another properly (does this feel right?). A lot of times I will use this to master with or at least see where I am at when I start the loudness increase. Sometimes this tells me Iâm not done with my mixâŚ
I occasionally use something completely different just to reset my ears from what I am hearing. so if I am mixing metal I may throw on some pop of some sort, just to get a sense of tonal differences and to make sure Iâm not losing myself in the direction Iâm heading.
While I totally get what youâre saying, what youâre talking about is basically mixing out of context. If you were to listen to soloed tracks of a big name mixing engineer, I think youâd be surprised at how (un?)pro they sound. There are some youtube videos that can give you a chance to hear some examples of HUGE songs with parts soloed. Iâll see what I can find for you.
Mixing in context is one of those major steps that takes you to that next level, but it can really take a long time to get used to it. I still struggle with that. It wasnât until I heard some examples of finished tracks that were soloed. Guitars and bass in particular sounded pretty crappy soloed. Certainly not a tone Iâd dare use live (although, maybe I should!). This would make a really good article (including audio examples). Hey @ColdRoomStudio, would you be open to providing some soloed examples like weâre talking about?
ive done my share of listening to isolated stuffâŚI love it lol. Of course the context is important, but huge powerful drums are huge powerful drums are huge powerful drums areâŚwell u get the idea
I have ears enough to hear the difference between a peanut (my drums) and Alex VanHalens or Bonhams
in any case I am going to enter into some study of this very question (pro rock drum sounds)âŚwhich i am doing as we speak
its not ALWAYS out of context anyway, because often the dude does a short drum solo or a nice long fill where the whole band drops out. Boom, their is your drum sound right there
for instance a fave from my car cruising days:
Bryan is absolutely right on the money here. Mixing in context is so crucial. Soloâd drum tracks (or any other instrument for that matter) might sound awesome by themselves, and then when mixed might sound like complete crap. And the reverse can also be true. Sure, sometimes we solo tracks while adjusting their settings when we need to really hear whatâs changing, but then we un-solo right away to get the mix back up and hear what it sounds like with the other instruments. In the end, it will be a mix, so that should be the final arbiter when making mix decisions.
I doubt very much anyone told you that it was âdumbâ to post those at RR, thatâs just not how we roll. You may have interpreted the comment that way, but I would be very surprised if it werenât more along the lines of what Bryan said, namely that there really is not a whole lot to be gained by bashing a soloâd drum track.
All part of the journeyâŚ!
Drums are definitely a study of their own. Sooooo much to learn about mixing drums. Personally, I think if you can dial in your drum mix and get your vocals sounding great, the rest fall into place quite easily.
haha, lets not get it twisted, RR was still the internet. I did have issues with a particular member who was a regular and essentially I stopped posting. Same guy numerous times and i was told âoh, thats just him, dont let him bother youâ
Life is too short for me to dig up old posts of people being idiotic lol
But lets not paint it like the internet will ever be free love and peace signs
haha! thatâs funny. I think I know who you mean. Iâm pretty sure he hung up his headphones a while back (if Iâm guessing correctly)
I have seen his name mentioned as someone who hasnt come over here yet. no offense but im glad
All of my songs start with drums. Thats my writing process. I program a song on drums: intro/verse/maybe prechorus/chorus/bridge/ etc
Then I lay down basic guitars. I literally have dozens and dozens of decent tracks written as far as the guitar riffs and tonalities and arrangmentâŚbut the drums might be weak and overall mix weak. So those tracks will probably fall by the wayside since I generally suck at going backwards to fix things (yes, I have many hangups lol)
Any improvement in my drum sound will make a HUGE improvement in my overall process
Again, as far as context, you get about 10 seconds of solo drums at the beginning of this album (except for the stupid drill) and it simply sounds fantastic before anything else even comes in
I keep the Nirvana Nevermind album on standby and Black Keys El Camino (if I can ever pull off some of that Tchad Blake mojo, Iâll be pumped!). Other than that, I try to think about some similar (to what Iâm mixing) material that I recall having a great sound.
Sometimes however, Iâll keep some tracks around that give me ideas to try. I may utilize an idea from a hip-hop tune on an alternative rock track. Itâs all fair game
@Jon-Jon those drums sounds you are referring to Bonham and the intro from Van Halen have a lot of room mics in them. Its what I call great for the period but doesnât have as much as it used to in modern rock. Programming drums I find it really hard to get a good room sound. I have superior drummer and never was really able to get that the same way as micing a kit in a room. My opinion is that drums are really the only instrument that really need a decent room to record them. That may be why that big drum sound is disappearing more and more (nobody can afford the studios anymore). There are other techniques you can employ like parallel compression on the drum bus to aid in that sound though. I see where you were going with the solod drums, but what we are trying to say is that I bet if you mixed these same Van Halen drums by themselves they probably wouldnât have sounded like the version you hear now, and technically they arenât solod and just that little bit of guitar can make a big difference. The more you start mixing the more you will understand relationships. when I solo an instrument its to pinpoint something I hear in the context of the mix and then go back and forth between the solod instrument and the mix. I know it sounds like you should be able to solo everything and when you put it together it should work but it rarely if ever happens. I also get what you are saying about any improvement would be better, but how do you know what to do until you hear it in the mix is the point I think everyone is trying to make. A solod snare might sound awesome by itself until you bring in something and its all wrong, now just imagine that with an entire drum kit.
Something I didnât mention before⌠I like referencing mixes from the early '90s because theyâve not been smashed to death in the volume war.
Obviously genre dependent, but Soundgardenâs Superunknown is a great example of an album thatâs got loads of dynamics left and only some very mild limiting. Toolâs Undertow and RATMâs self-titled debut are also great references. Post-Deadwing Porcupine Tree and Steven Wilsonâs solo output is barely mastered at all.
Nice to hear what a good mix sounds like, sometimes if youâre referencing a cd master from the late '90s onwards itâs hard to tell whatâs the result of the mix and whatâs just a by-product of hard limiting/converter clipping.
What I have started doing is to just listen to music I know sounds âgoodâ and then listen to my stuff. If I still enjoy my mix right after that then I am happy.
I believe it is a good idea to reference pro tracks, specially when working with the low end. They have proven worthy of radio time and appeal to a lot of people.
About the drum question. They can sound pro by themselves, but maybe do not blend with the rest of the instruments in a mix. Drum mixing, as any other instrument, shall begin with a purpose. How do you want them to sound in the mix? Bigger? Wider? Small? a lot of mid frequencies?
/Lukas
I understand that pointâŚbut whats the alternative?? if u start with a crappy drum sound, at what point does it magically get better?
to me, drums are the foundationâŚget them right and then everything else can adjust to them, not vice versa. I assume thats why in days gone by theyd spend a week âgetting a drum soundâ before they ever tuned a guitar etc
besides, its just rock n rollâŚits not brain surgery. We are talking drums, 1 or 2 guitars, bass, vox and maybe some bgv. If I cant get that working with some powerful sounding drums then ill give it up lol
another nice old track, one of my fave drummers, Denny Carmassi. Interesting huh, Ted Templeman again. Dude knew his stuff
I have never got on with ref tracks.Wish I could